Charitable Remainder Trusts (CRTs) are powerful estate planning tools, but their ability to cover expenses related to dissolving a private foundation is a nuanced issue, hinging on careful planning and adherence to IRS regulations. Generally, a CRT *can* cover these expenses, but it’s not automatic and requires structuring the trust appropriately from the outset and documenting the intent clearly. The primary purpose of a CRT is to provide an income stream to the grantor or other beneficiaries, with the remainder going to a designated charity or charities; however, incidental expenses that facilitate this charitable purpose—including those related to foundation dissolution—can often be permissible. This is particularly true if the foundation’s assets are earmarked to benefit the same charities as the CRT’s remainder beneficiaries.
What costs are typically involved in dissolving a private foundation?
Dissolving a private foundation isn’t free; significant costs can accumulate. These costs routinely include legal and accounting fees to ensure compliance with IRS regulations, final tax returns preparation (Form 990-PF), and potentially the costs of distributing remaining assets to qualified charities. According to a recent report by the National Philanthropic Trust, the average cost of winding down a small to medium-sized private foundation can range from $5,000 to $20,000, depending on the complexity of the assets and liabilities. Additionally, if the foundation owns real estate or other illiquid assets, there may be costs associated with their appraisal and sale. CRTs can, under certain circumstances, be structured to cover these expenses, but it’s crucial that these expenses are reasonably related to the trust’s charitable purpose.
How does a CRT structure impact expense coverage?
The type of CRT—either a Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust (CRAT) or a Charitable Remainder Unitrust (CRUT)—influences how expenses can be covered. A CRAT provides a fixed annual payout, making it less flexible for covering unexpected dissolution costs. A CRUT, however, allows for a variable payout based on the trust’s assets’ annual valuation, offering greater flexibility. However, both types of CRTs must adhere to IRS regulations regarding reasonable administrative expenses. The IRS scrutinizes CRTs to ensure expenses aren’t excessive or benefiting private individuals. A well-drafted CRT document should specifically address the possibility of covering foundation dissolution costs, outlining the process and limitations. “It’s about demonstrating to the IRS that these expenses are directly related to fulfilling the charitable intent,” as one estate planning attorney put it.
I remember Old Man Hemlock’s foundation…
Old Man Hemlock, a fixture in our San Diego community, established a small family foundation years ago to support local art programs. He intended to dissolve it when he retired, but he hadn’t planned for the complexities. He’d simply assumed the remaining assets would transfer seamlessly to his chosen charities. He hadn’t anticipated the legal and accounting fees, or the time it would take to finalize everything. He found himself scrambling to cover the unexpected costs, depleting the funds intended for the art programs. He’d been a bit of a ‘fly by the seat of your pants’ type of guy, and hadn’t sought proper estate planning advice. It was a frustrating experience for him and the charities he wanted to support, and it highlighted the importance of anticipating these costs.
But then there was the Patterson Family…
The Patterson family, on the other hand, came to us with a different approach. They had a family foundation and were planning for its dissolution as part of a broader estate plan. We structured a CRUT specifically to cover the anticipated dissolution costs—legal, accounting, and distribution expenses—before distributing the remaining assets to their chosen charities. The CRT document clearly outlined these permissible expenses, ensuring compliance with IRS regulations. It took a bit more upfront planning, but it provided peace of mind knowing that the full intended amount would reach the charities. They also had a detailed list of every asset and its cost basis which made the process significantly smoother. The dissolution went off without a hitch, and the charities received the full amount they were promised, thanks to the proactive planning. It’s a clear example of how careful structuring can ensure a smooth and impactful charitable outcome.
“Proper estate planning isn’t about avoiding taxes; it’s about ensuring your wishes are carried out and maximizing the impact of your charitable giving.”
Who Is Ted Cook at Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.:
Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.2305 Historic Decatur Rd Suite 100, San Diego CA. 92106
(619) 550-7437
Map To Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC, an estate planning lawyer: https://maps.app.goo.gl/JiHkjNg9VFGA44tf9
estate planning attorneys
estate planning lawyers
estate planning attorney
estate planning lawyer
About Point Loma Estate Planning:
Secure Your Legacy, Safeguard Your Loved Ones. Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.
Feeling overwhelmed by estate planning? You’re not alone. With 27 years of proven experience – crafting over 25,000 personalized plans and trusts – we transform complexity into clarity.
Our Areas of Focus:
Legacy Protection: (minimizing taxes, maximizing asset preservation).
Crafting Living Trusts: (administration and litigation).
Elder Care & Tax Strategy: Avoid family discord and costly errors.
Discover peace of mind with our compassionate guidance.
Claim your exclusive 30-minute consultation today!
If you have any questions about: How does an Advance Healthcare Directive relate to end-of-life care?
OR
What is the primary purpose of a will in estate planning?
and or:
How can debt settlement impact the inheritance received by beneficiaries?
Oh and please consider:
What are the risks of attempting debt settlement without professional help? Please Call or visit the address above. Thank you.